PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZSML.TO
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF
4.62%0.20%17.47%12.67%-0.40%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF
0.41%19.67%25.44%16.79%-5.55%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSML.TO achieves a 4.62% return, which is significantly higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.41% return.


ZSML.TO

1D
1.69%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
4.62%
6M
4.77%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
5.80%
10Y*

ZEQT.TO

1D
1.39%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
0.41%
6M
3.36%
1Y
20.63%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSML.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEQT.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSML.TO
ZSML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ZSML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEQT.TO
ZEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSML.TOZEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.26

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

1.78

-0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.27

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.80

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.39

7.72

-3.33

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the ZEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSML.TO and ZEQT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSML.TOZEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.26

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.01

-0.61

Correlation

The correlation between ZSML.TO and ZEQT.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSML.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than ZEQT.TO's 1.45% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
ZSML.TO
BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF
1.14%1.21%1.22%1.47%1.72%1.02%1.29%
ZEQT.TO
BMO All-Equity ETF
1.45%1.45%1.69%2.13%2.43%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSML.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.32%, which is greater than ZEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSML.TO and ZEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSML.TOZEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.32%

-16.87%

-18.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.11%

-11.90%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-5.86%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.08%

-3.09%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

2.78%

+1.17%

Volatility

ZSML.TO vs. ZEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO S&P US Small Cap Index ETF (ZSML.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT.TO) at 5.74%. This indicates that ZSML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZEQT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZSML.TOZEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

5.74%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.56%

10.05%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.10%

16.41%

+6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

13.78%

+5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

13.78%

+8.63%