PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSEP vs. PMMY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September (ZSEP) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSEP achieves a 3.46% return, which is significantly higher than PMMY's 2.58% return.


ZSEP

1D
0.13%
1M
0.43%
6M
3.08%
YTD
3.46%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.15%

PMMY

1D
0.17%
1M
0.41%
6M
2.24%
YTD
2.58%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$160.89$4.47K$39.57K
$67.71K$172.39K$462.24K

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZSEP and PMMY is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2025

0.63

The correlation between ZSEP and PMMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSEP vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZSEP
ZSEP Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ZSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

PMMY
PMMY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PMMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September (ZSEP) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZSEPPMMYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.89

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

8.62

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.67

44.94

-23.27

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the PMMY Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSEP and PMMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSEP drawdown since its inception was -3.97%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSEP and PMMY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSEPPMMYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-0.60%

-3.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.45%

-0.60%

-0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-0.06%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

0.11%

+0.18%

Volatility

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr September (ZSEP) is 0.45%, while PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY) has a volatility of 0.58%. This indicates that ZSEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSEPPMMYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.58%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

1.20%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38%

1.40%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.23%

1.54%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.23%

1.54%

+1.69%

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSEP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZSEP vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZSEP nor PMMY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSEP and PMMY have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PMMY has higher volatility (0.58%) compared to ZSEP (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZSEP dropped -3.97% vs PMMY's -0.60%.

On 1-year performance, ZSEP leads with 6.50% vs 5.12% for PMMY. On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ZSEP has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZSEP has performed better with a 6.50% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZSEP.

ZSEP and PMMY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZSEP and 0.50% for PMMY.

PMMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSEP and PMMY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer