PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSDB.TO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than ZST.TO's 1.08% return.


ZSDB.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.77%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
10Y*

ZST.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.08%
6M
0.26%
1Y
1.68%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*
2.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
0.74%3.93%5.94%4.67%-2.83%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
1.08%2.03%5.16%5.33%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSDB.TO and ZST.TO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.23

The correlation between ZSDB.TO and ZST.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSDB.TO
ZSDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ZST.TO
ZST.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZST.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) and BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSDB.TOZST.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.83

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.68

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

4.51

+2.08

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the ZST.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSDB.TO and ZST.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSDB.TOZST.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.56

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

4.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

3.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

1.81

-0.64

Drawdowns

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSDB.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, which is greater than ZST.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSDB.TO and ZST.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSDB.TOZST.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-1.06%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.01%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

-1.01%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.00%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-0.13%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.37%

+0.06%

Volatility

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that ZSDB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZST.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSDB.TOZST.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.08%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

1.05%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

1.08%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.52%

0.72%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.52%

0.71%

+2.81%

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSDB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZST.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZSDB.TO vs. ZST.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZSDB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than ZST.TO's 2.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
1.30%1.28%1.35%1.77%1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZST.TO
BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF
2.55%2.82%4.65%4.79%2.75%2.29%2.65%2.82%3.43%4.05%3.92%3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSDB.TO and ZST.TO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSDB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSDB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZST.TO.

ZSDB.TO is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while ZST.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSDB.TO and 0.17% for ZST.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSDB.TO and ZST.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer