PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) and RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZSDB.TO achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than RCDB.NEO's 1.15% return.


ZSDB.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.77%
1Y
2.82%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
10Y*

RCDB.NEO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.09%
YTD
1.15%
6M
0.91%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
0.74%3.93%5.94%4.67%-2.83%
RCDB.NEO
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF
1.15%3.75%5.58%5.68%-2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ZSDB.TO and RCDB.NEO is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.45

The correlation between ZSDB.TO and RCDB.NEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.58 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZSDB.TO
ZSDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

RCDB.NEO
RCDB.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCDB.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) and RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZSDB.TORCDB.NEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.91

+0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.59

6.47

+0.12

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZSDB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the RCDB.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZSDB.TO and RCDB.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZSDB.TORCDB.NEODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.29

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.17

0.45

+0.72

Drawdowns

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZSDB.TO drawdown since its inception was -4.88%, smaller than the maximum RCDB.NEO drawdown of -8.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSDB.TO and RCDB.NEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZSDB.TORCDB.NEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-8.31%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.44%

-1.59%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.44%

-1.59%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.03%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.72%

-1.41%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.47%

-0.04%

Volatility

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF (ZSDB.TO) is 0.63%, while RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF (RCDB.NEO) has a volatility of 0.67%. This indicates that ZSDB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCDB.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZSDB.TORCDB.NEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.67%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.58%

1.84%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89%

2.35%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.52%

2.83%

+0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.52%

5.48%

-1.96%

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZSDB.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RCDB.NEO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZSDB.TO vs. RCDB.NEO - Dividend Comparison

ZSDB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than RCDB.NEO's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
RCDB.NEO
RBC Canadian Discount Bond ETF
2.11%1.96%1.58%1.22%1.16%1.33%1.68%0.78%
ZSDB.TO
BMO Short-Term Discount Bond ETF
1.30%1.28%1.35%1.77%1.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZSDB.TO and RCDB.NEO have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSDB.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSDB.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RCDB.NEO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and RBC. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ZSDB.TO and 0.17% for RCDB.NEO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZSDB.TO and RCDB.NEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer