ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO
ZSB.TO (BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF) is Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Short Term Overall Bond Index, while RY.TO (Royal Bank of Canada) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ZSB.TO returned 2.01%/yr vs 20.37%/yr for RY.TO. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZSB.TO achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly lower than RY.TO's 15.19% return.
ZSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 2.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.01%
- 10Y*
- —
RY.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 6M
- 23.28%
- 1Y
- 56.56%
- 3Y*
- 33.65%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 17.23%
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZSB.TO BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 0.96% | 3.77% | 5.55% | 5.05% | -4.08% | -1.20% | 5.13% | 2.95% | 1.69% |
RY.TO Royal Bank of Canada | 15.19% | 39.60% | 34.37% | 9.80% | -1.52% | 33.09% | 6.52% | 14.33% | -4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZSB.TO and RY.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, ZSB.TO and RY.TO have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZSB.TO
RY.TO
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZSB.TO | RY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.76 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 7.00 | -5.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.41 | 25.96 | -19.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZSB.TO | RY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 4.15 | -2.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 1.38 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.45 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZSB.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.49%, smaller than the maximum RY.TO drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZSB.TO and RY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZSB.TO | RY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.49% | -70.56% | +63.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | -8.12% | +6.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.46% | -16.00% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.12% | -21.21% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -20.93% | +19.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 2.19% | -1.75% |
Volatility
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF (ZSB.TO) is 0.81%, while Royal Bank of Canada (RY.TO) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that ZSB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RY.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZSB.TO | RY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 4.60% | -3.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.62% | 10.56% | -8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 13.70% | -11.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 14.91% | -12.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.63% | 17.26% | -14.63% |
Dividends
ZSB.TO vs. RY.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZSB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, more than RY.TO's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RY.TO Royal Bank of Canada | 2.39% | 2.58% | 3.23% | 3.99% | 3.90% | 3.22% | 4.10% | 3.96% | 4.03% | 3.39% | 3.57% | 4.15% |
ZSB.TO BMO Short-Term Bond Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.16% | 2.91% | 2.54% | 2.60% | 2.43% | 2.34% | 2.40% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZSB.TO and RY.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ZSB.TO and RY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer