ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Real Return Bond Index ETF (ZRR.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO).
ZRR.TO and ZMMK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZRR.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Real Return Federal Non-Agency Bond Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. ZMMK.TO is an actively managed fund by BMO. It was launched on Nov 28, 2021.
Performance
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZRR.TO BMO Real Return Bond Index ETF | 1.34% | 0.12% | 4.03% | 0.41% | -14.56% | 1.84% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 0.57% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZRR.TO achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.57% return.
ZRR.TO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 1.34%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- -1.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 2.62%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZRR.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZRR.TO
ZMMK.TO
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Real Return Bond Index ETF (ZRR.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZRR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 10.17 | -10.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | 25.94 | -26.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 6.05 | -5.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 86.98 | -87.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 406.21 | -406.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZRR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 10.17 | -10.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 10.37 | -10.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZRR.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZRR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.68% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZRR.TO BMO Real Return Bond Index ETF | 4.35% | 4.53% | 4.78% | 6.54% | 6.88% | 1.97% | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.89% | 1.87% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.68% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZRR.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.84%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRR.TO and ZMMK.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZRR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.84% | -0.16% | -23.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.80% | -0.03% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.45% | 0.00% | -9.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | 0.00% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 0.01% | +2.88% |
Volatility
ZRR.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Real Return Bond Index ETF (ZRR.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.08%. This indicates that ZRR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZRR.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.65% | 0.08% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.36% | 0.20% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.35% | 0.26% | +7.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 0.34% | +11.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 0.34% | +10.18% |