ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO
ZRE.TO (BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF) and ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - ZRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO returned 6.80%/yr vs 20.08%/yr for ZQQ.TO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZQQ.TO.
Performance
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than ZQQ.TO's 19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO has underperformed ZQQ.TO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while ZQQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.08% annualized return.
ZRE.TO
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF | 9.53% | 11.21% | 2.82% | 0.84% | -17.80% | 33.96% | -7.79% | 25.79% | 3.29% | 14.28% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZRE.TO and ZQQ.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ZRE.TO and ZQQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZRE.TO
ZQQ.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
ZRE.TO
ZQQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Communication Services
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Energy
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Financial Services
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Healthcare
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Industrials
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Technology
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Utilities
ZRE.TO
-
ZQQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZRE.TO
ZQQ.TO
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZRE.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 3.01 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 11.25 | -6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZRE.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 2.46 | -1.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.72 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.90 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.91 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than ZQQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and ZQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZRE.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -36.39% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -12.86% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.16% | -22.79% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.52% | -36.39% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -36.39% | -9.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.28% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -5.37% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 3.43% | -0.79% |
Volatility
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) is 2.83%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that ZRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZQQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZRE.TO | ZQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 4.54% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.39% | 12.02% | -3.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 15.73% | -4.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 22.57% | -7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 22.41% | -4.73% |
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ZQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZRE.TO vs. ZQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than ZQQ.TO's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF | 4.42% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 5.07% | 4.90% | 3.82% | 4.95% | 4.11% | 4.89% | 4.98% | 5.39% | 5.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZRE.TO and ZQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZRE.TO.
ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ZQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZRE.TO and 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZRE.TO and ZQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer