PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO has outperformed ZAG.TO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while ZAG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.66% annualized return.


ZRE.TO

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.68%
YTD
9.53%
6M
10.66%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
6.80%

ZAG.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.75%
YTD
1.70%
6M
0.89%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.24%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
9.53%11.21%2.82%0.84%-17.80%33.96%-7.79%25.79%3.29%14.28%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.70%2.25%4.48%6.41%-11.60%-2.60%8.34%6.84%1.12%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ZRE.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.11

The correlation between ZRE.TO and ZAG.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.35 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZRE.TO
ZAG.TO

Real Estate

100.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

ZRE.TO
100.0%
ZAG.TO
0.0%

Basic Materials

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Communication Services

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Energy

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Financial Services

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Healthcare

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Industrials

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Technology

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Utilities

ZRE.TO

-

ZAG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZRE.TO
ZRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZRE.TOZAG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.13

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.17

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

2.73

+1.56

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZRE.TO and ZAG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZRE.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.73

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.12

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.23

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Drawdowns

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than ZAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and ZAG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZRE.TOZAG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-18.03%

-28.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-2.79%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-5.42%

-11.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.52%

-15.77%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-18.03%

-28.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-1.09%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-3.54%

-4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.19%

+1.45%

Volatility

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) at 1.68%. This indicates that ZRE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZRE.TOZAG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.68%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

3.43%

+4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

4.46%

+6.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

6.58%

+8.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

7.11%

+10.57%

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZRE.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than ZAG.TO's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.42%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
4.42%4.90%5.19%5.07%4.90%3.82%4.95%4.11%4.89%4.98%5.39%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZRE.TO and ZAG.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZAG.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZAG.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZRE.TO.

ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while ZAG.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while ZAG.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZRE.TO and 0.09% for ZAG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZRE.TO and ZAG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer