ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO
ZRE.TO (BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF) and XEI.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while XEI.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO returned 6.80%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for XEI.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for XEI.TO.
Performance
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 22.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO has underperformed XEI.TO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while XEI.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.32% annualized return.
ZRE.TO
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
XEI.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 22.21%
- 6M
- 23.56%
- 1Y
- 43.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF | 9.53% | 11.21% | 2.82% | 0.84% | -17.80% | 33.96% | -7.79% | 25.79% | 3.29% | 14.28% |
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 22.21% | 25.96% | 15.42% | 6.69% | 0.41% | 35.88% | -7.53% | 25.44% | -10.85% | 7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZRE.TO and XEI.TO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.54 |
The correlation between ZRE.TO and XEI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZRE.TO
XEI.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
ZRE.TO
XEI.TO
Basic Materials
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Communication Services
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Energy
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Financial Services
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Healthcare
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Industrials
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Technology
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Utilities
ZRE.TO
-
XEI.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZRE.TO
XEI.TO
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZRE.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.27 | -1.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 19.53 | -17.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 66.28 | -62.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZRE.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 6.08 | -5.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.39 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.77 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.67 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, roughly equal to the maximum XEI.TO drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and XEI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZRE.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -45.51% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -2.24% | -4.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.16% | -9.92% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.52% | -17.32% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -45.51% | -0.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.76% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -5.05% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 0.66% | +1.98% |
Volatility
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) have volatilities of 2.83% and 2.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZRE.TO | XEI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.87% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.39% | 6.01% | +2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 7.21% | +3.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 11.24% | +4.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.01% | +1.67% |
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZRE.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than XEI.TO's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEI.TO iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF | 3.56% | 4.39% | 5.56% | 5.08% | 4.78% | 3.65% | 5.13% | 4.71% | 5.53% | 4.37% | 4.51% | 5.75% |
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF | 4.42% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 5.07% | 4.90% | 3.82% | 4.95% | 4.11% | 4.89% | 4.98% | 5.39% | 5.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZRE.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZRE.TO.
ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while XEI.TO is Canada Equities. ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZRE.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZRE.TO and XEI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer