PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 44.34% return. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO has underperformed XEG.TO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while XEG.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


ZRE.TO

1D
-0.34%
1M
0.68%
YTD
9.53%
6M
10.66%
1Y
11.30%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
6.80%

XEG.TO

1D
1.17%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
44.34%
6M
39.73%
1Y
70.40%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
29.48%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
9.53%11.21%2.82%0.84%-17.80%33.96%-7.79%25.79%3.29%14.28%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
44.34%16.72%14.08%3.52%53.25%83.71%-34.41%8.98%-27.05%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between ZRE.TO and XEG.TO is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2010

0.25

The correlation between ZRE.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZRE.TO
XEG.TO

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

ZRE.TO
100.0%
XEG.TO

-

Basic Materials

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Communication Services

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Energy

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO
100.0%

Financial Services

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Healthcare

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Industrials

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Technology

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Utilities

ZRE.TO

-

XEG.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZRE.TO
ZRE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZRE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZRE.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.49

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

6.36

-4.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.29

19.02

-14.74

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZRE.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZRE.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZRE.TOXEG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

3.11

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

1.04

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.36

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.28

+0.24

Drawdowns

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZRE.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.29%

-87.74%

+41.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.07%

-11.12%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-25.67%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.52%

-28.42%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.29%

-79.66%

+33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-4.00%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.74%

-29.19%

+21.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

3.71%

-1.07%

Volatility

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) is 2.83%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 9.31%. This indicates that ZRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZRE.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

9.31%

-6.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

18.99%

-10.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.09%

22.76%

-11.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

28.62%

-13.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

33.41%

-15.73%

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZRE.TO and XEG.TO have an expense ratio of 0.61%.


Dividends

ZRE.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than XEG.TO's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.65%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%
ZRE.TO
BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF
4.42%4.90%5.19%5.07%4.90%3.82%4.95%4.11%4.89%4.98%5.39%5.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZRE.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.61% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZRE.TO and XEG.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.61% per year.

ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZRE.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer