ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO
ZRE.TO (BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF) and HXH.TO (Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZRE.TO is a REIT fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while HXH.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO returned 6.80%/yr vs 11.74%/yr for HXH.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZRE.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for HXH.TO.
Performance
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZRE.TO achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly lower than HXH.TO's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ZRE.TO has underperformed HXH.TO with an annualized return of 6.80%, while HXH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.74% annualized return.
ZRE.TO
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 10.66%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 8.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.45%
- 10Y*
- 6.80%
HXH.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 40.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- 16.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.74%
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF | 9.53% | 11.21% | 2.82% | 0.84% | -17.80% | 33.96% | -7.79% | 25.79% | 3.29% | 14.28% |
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 20.31% | 25.86% | 15.24% | 6.33% | 5.00% | 34.51% | -7.66% | 22.17% | -14.86% | 8.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZRE.TO and HXH.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2016 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ZRE.TO and HXH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZRE.TO
HXH.TO
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Real Estate
ZRE.TO
HXH.TO
Basic Materials
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Communication Services
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Energy
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Financial Services
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Healthcare
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Industrials
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Technology
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Utilities
ZRE.TO
-
HXH.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZRE.TO
HXH.TO
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) and Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZRE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 2.08 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 16.25 | -14.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 50.77 | -46.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZRE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 4.99 | -3.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 1.33 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.74 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.76 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZRE.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.29%, which is greater than HXH.TO's maximum drawdown of -40.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZRE.TO and HXH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZRE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -40.80% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -2.52% | -4.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.16% | -10.55% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.52% | -15.88% | -16.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | -40.80% | -5.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -0.73% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -4.86% | -2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 0.81% | +1.83% |
Volatility
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF (ZRE.TO) is 2.83%, while Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF (HXH.TO) has a volatility of 3.02%. This indicates that ZRE.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HXH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZRE.TO | HXH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.02% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.39% | 6.79% | +1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.09% | 8.23% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 12.18% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 16.05% | +1.63% |
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZRE.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HXH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZRE.TO vs. HXH.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZRE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, while HXH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXH.TO Global X Canadian High Dividend Index Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZRE.TO BMO Equal Weight REITs Index ETF | 4.42% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 5.07% | 4.90% | 3.82% | 4.95% | 4.11% | 4.89% | 4.98% | 5.39% | 5.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZRE.TO and HXH.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for ZRE.TO.
ZRE.TO is categorized as REIT, while HXH.TO is Canada Equities. ZRE.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada REIT Index, while HXH.TO tracks Solactive Canadian High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for ZRE.TO and 0.11% for HXH.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZRE.TO and HXH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer