ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO
ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) and ZUQ.TO (BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZUQ.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO returned 20.08%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for ZUQ.TO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZUQ.TO.
Performance
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than ZUQ.TO's 9.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO has outperformed ZUQ.TO with an annualized return of 20.08%, while ZUQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.38% annualized return.
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
ZUQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.91%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 19.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 9.39% | 5.78% | 34.02% | 33.24% | -18.33% | 26.40% | 19.92% | 31.74% | 4.70% | 16.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZUQ.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2014 | 0.71 |
The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZUQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Communication Services
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Healthcare
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Industrials
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Utilities
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Energy
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Financial Services
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
Real Estate
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZQQ.TO
ZUQ.TO
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZQQ.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.30 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.81 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 5.87 | +5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZQQ.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.56 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.94 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.94 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than ZUQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and ZUQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZQQ.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.39% | -26.94% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -10.57% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -17.93% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -26.94% | -9.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -26.94% | -9.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.10% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -4.60% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.26% | +0.17% |
Volatility
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF (ZUQ.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZUQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZQQ.TO | ZUQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 2.31% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 9.60% | +2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 12.29% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 16.35% | +6.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 17.52% | +4.89% |
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZUQ.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZQQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ZUQ.TO's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
ZUQ.TO BMO MSCI USA High Quality Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.57% | 0.86% | 0.99% | 0.80% | 0.96% | 0.96% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 1.00% | 0.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZQQ.TO and ZUQ.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZUQ.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZUQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZUQ.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZUQ.TO tracks MSCI USA Quality Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.33% for ZUQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and ZUQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer