ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) and ZTIP.TO (BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZTIP.TO is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZQQ.TO returned 13.49%/yr vs 6.25%/yr for ZTIP.TO. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. ZQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for ZTIP.TO.

Performance

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 15.13% return, which is significantly higher than ZTIP.TO's 5.16% return.

ZQQ.TO

• 1D: 0.79%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: 15.13%
• 6M: 9.73%
• 1Y: 25.71%
• 3Y*: 23.05%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: 20.06%

ZTIP.TO

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.65%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 5.48%
• 1Y: 7.33%
• 3Y*: 7.73%
• 5Y*: 6.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)	15.13%	14.59%	24.00%	52.52%	-33.75%	21.18%
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF	5.16%	1.12%	13.84%	1.93%	3.96%	4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZTIP.TO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2021	-0.15

Return for Risk

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZQQ.TO

ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ZTIP.TO

ZTIP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 51
ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
ZTIP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ZTIP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ZTIP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ZTIP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZQQ.TO	ZTIP.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.62	-0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	2.25	-0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.96	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.23	5.25	-0.01

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the ZTIP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZQQ.TO and ZTIP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than ZTIP.TO's maximum drawdown of -5.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and ZTIP.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZQQ.TO	ZTIP.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.39%	-5.60%	-30.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.65%	-3.78%	-11.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.79%	-5.60%	-17.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.39%	-5.60%	-30.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	-0.06%	-4.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-1.52%	-3.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.92%	1.40%	+3.52%

Volatility

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF (ZTIP.TO) at 1.04%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZTIP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZQQ.TO	ZTIP.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.98%	1.04%	+7.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.91%	3.05%	+11.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.04%	4.58%	+13.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.90%	6.34%	+16.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.54%	6.26%	+16.28%

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTIP.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZQQ.TO vs. ZTIP.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than ZTIP.TO's 3.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)	0.23%	0.27%	0.37%	0.32%	0.45%	0.14%	0.41%	0.51%	0.64%	0.57%	1.60%	0.81%
ZTIP.TO BMO Short-Term US TIPS Index ETF	3.37%	3.63%	3.63%	4.91%	4.93%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZQQ.TO and ZTIP.TO in my portfolio?

ZQQ.TO and ZTIP.TO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZQQ.TO or ZTIP.TO?

On fees, ZTIP.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZQQ.TO or ZTIP.TO?

ZTIP.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

What is the main difference between ZQQ.TO and ZTIP.TO?

ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZTIP.TO is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZTIP.TO tracks Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Government Inflation-Linked 0-5 Year Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.17% for ZTIP.TO.