ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO
ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) and ZLB.TO (BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZLB.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. ZQQ.TO is passively managed, while ZLB.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO returned 20.08%/yr vs 10.67%/yr for ZLB.TO. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.39% expense ratio.
Performance
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than ZLB.TO's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO has outperformed ZLB.TO with an annualized return of 20.08%, while ZLB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.67% annualized return.
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
ZLB.TO
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 14.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 3.14% | 25.29% | 15.31% | 9.41% | -0.35% | 22.93% | 1.51% | 21.92% | -2.76% | 11.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2011 | 0.49 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Communication Services
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Healthcare
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
-
Industrials
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Utilities
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Basic Materials
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Energy
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
-
Financial Services
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Real Estate
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZQQ.TO
ZLB.TO
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZQQ.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 2.77 | +0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 10.29 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZQQ.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 1.80 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.24 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.14 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than ZLB.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZQQ.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.39% | -33.96% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -5.36% | -7.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -8.01% | -14.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -13.00% | -23.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -33.96% | -2.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -1.70% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -2.46% | -2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.45% | +1.98% |
Volatility
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB.TO) at 2.47%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZLB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZQQ.TO | ZLB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 2.47% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 6.38% | +5.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 8.29% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 9.44% | +13.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 12.15% | +10.26% |
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO have an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Dividends
ZQQ.TO vs. ZLB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ZLB.TO's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZLB.TO BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 2.37% | 2.67% | 2.66% | 2.39% | 2.83% | 2.44% | 2.76% | 2.52% | 2.94% | 2.34% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.39% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.39% per year.
ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZLB.TO is Canada Equities.
Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and ZLB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer