PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than ZEQ.TO's 1.89% return. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO has outperformed ZEQ.TO with an annualized return of 20.08%, while ZEQ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


ZQQ.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
6M
18.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
20.08%

ZEQ.TO

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.57%
YTD
1.89%
6M
2.82%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
19.82%18.38%24.00%52.52%-33.75%26.68%45.33%37.08%-2.29%31.51%
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF
1.89%7.89%2.54%15.35%-12.26%25.16%6.22%33.21%-7.10%15.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZEQ.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2014

0.58

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZEQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZQQ.TO
ZEQ.TO

Technology

54.1%
10.2%

Communication Services

15.5%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
15.3%

Healthcare

4.2%
24.5%

Industrials

3.1%
22.4%

Utilities

1.4%
0.3%

Basic Materials

1.2%
6.2%

Energy

0.6%

-

Financial Services

0.2%
9.7%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

ZQQ.TO
54.1%
ZEQ.TO
10.2%

Communication Services

ZQQ.TO
15.5%
ZEQ.TO
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

ZQQ.TO
12.2%
ZEQ.TO
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZQQ.TO
7.6%
ZEQ.TO
15.3%

Healthcare

ZQQ.TO
4.2%
ZEQ.TO
24.5%

Industrials

ZQQ.TO
3.1%
ZEQ.TO
22.4%

Utilities

ZQQ.TO
1.4%
ZEQ.TO
0.3%

Basic Materials

ZQQ.TO
1.2%
ZEQ.TO
6.2%

Energy

ZQQ.TO
0.6%
ZEQ.TO

-

Financial Services

ZQQ.TO
0.2%
ZEQ.TO
9.7%

Real Estate

ZQQ.TO
0.1%
ZEQ.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ZEQ.TO
ZEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZQQ.TOZEQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.07

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.38

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

1.11

+10.14

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the ZEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZQQ.TO and ZEQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZQQ.TOZEQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

0.32

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.34

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.55

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.54

+0.36

Drawdowns

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than ZEQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -29.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and ZEQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZQQ.TOZEQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.39%

-29.13%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-10.97%

-1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

-14.47%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

-20.54%

-15.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

-29.13%

-7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-4.20%

+3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-4.31%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.76%

-0.33%

Volatility

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZEQ.TO) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZQQ.TOZEQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.59%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

10.60%

+1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

13.15%

+2.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

14.18%

+8.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

15.51%

+6.90%

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ZEQ.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZQQ.TO vs. ZEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ZEQ.TO's 3.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZEQ.TO
BMO MSCI Europe High Quality Hedged to CAD Index ETF
3.02%3.10%2.04%2.50%2.62%1.78%1.94%2.04%3.21%2.07%2.01%2.06%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZQQ.TO and ZEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZQQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZQQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZEQ.TO.

ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZEQ.TO is Europe Equities. ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZEQ.TO tracks MSCI Europe Quality 100% Hedged to CAD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.45% for ZEQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and ZEQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer