ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO
ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO returned 20.08%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZQQ.TO having a 19.82% return and ZEB.TO slightly lower at 19.22%. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO has outperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 20.08%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.82% annualized return.
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZQQ.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2010 | 0.47 |
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Communication Services
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Healthcare
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Industrials
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Utilities
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Basic Materials
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Energy
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Financial Services
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
Real Estate
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZQQ.TO
ZEB.TO
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZQQ.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.90 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 7.17 | -4.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 30.84 | -19.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZQQ.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 4.79 | -2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.35 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.94 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZQQ.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.39% | -39.69% | +3.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -8.44% | -4.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -14.80% | -7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -25.97% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -39.69% | +3.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -2.00% | +1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -5.65% | +0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 1.96% | +1.47% |
Volatility
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) is 4.54%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZQQ.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.89% | -0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 11.14% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 12.62% | +3.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 13.52% | +9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 16.91% | +5.50% |
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZQQ.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZQQ.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
ZQQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. ZQQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer