PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ.TO's 11.09% return.


ZQQ.TO

1D
-0.28%
1M
10.63%
YTD
19.82%
6M
18.08%
1Y
38.53%
3Y*
26.42%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
20.08%

JEPQ.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
6.30%
YTD
11.09%
6M
9.59%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
19.82%18.38%6.11%
JEPQ.TO
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF
11.09%10.46%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and JEPQ.TO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.83

The correlation between ZQQ.TO and JEPQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ZQQ.TO
JEPQ.TO

Technology

54.1%
54.0%

Communication Services

15.5%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
7.1%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.4%

Industrials

3.1%
3.0%

Utilities

1.4%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.0%

Energy

0.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.2%

Technology

ZQQ.TO
54.1%
JEPQ.TO
54.0%

Communication Services

ZQQ.TO
15.5%
JEPQ.TO
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ZQQ.TO
12.2%
JEPQ.TO
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

ZQQ.TO
7.6%
JEPQ.TO
7.1%

Healthcare

ZQQ.TO
4.2%
JEPQ.TO
4.4%

Industrials

ZQQ.TO
3.1%
JEPQ.TO
3.0%

Utilities

ZQQ.TO
1.4%
JEPQ.TO
1.2%

Basic Materials

ZQQ.TO
1.2%
JEPQ.TO
1.0%

Energy

ZQQ.TO
0.6%
JEPQ.TO
0.4%

Financial Services

ZQQ.TO
0.2%
JEPQ.TO
0.4%

Real Estate

ZQQ.TO
0.1%
JEPQ.TO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZQQ.TO
ZQQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZQQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ.TO
JEPQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
JEPQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZQQ.TOJEPQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.08

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

16.30

-5.05

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZQQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the JEPQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZQQ.TO and JEPQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZQQ.TOJEPQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.51

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

1.34

-0.44

Drawdowns

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than JEPQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and JEPQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZQQ.TOJEPQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.39%

-20.05%

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-7.74%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.40%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-3.36%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

1.93%

+1.50%

Volatility

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF (JEPQ.TO) at 4.05%. This indicates that ZQQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZQQ.TOJEPQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.05%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

9.88%

+2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.73%

12.58%

+3.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.57%

17.35%

+5.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

17.35%

+5.06%

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ.TO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZQQ.TO vs. JEPQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than JEPQ.TO's 10.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEPQ.TO
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active ETF
10.00%10.34%5.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZQQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)
0.22%0.27%0.37%0.32%0.45%0.14%0.41%0.51%0.64%0.57%1.60%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZQQ.TO and JEPQ.TO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JEPQ.TO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JEPQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.35% for JEPQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and JEPQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer