ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged)) and HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from BMO and Horizons respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO returned 20.08%/yr vs 22.59%/yr for HXQ.TO. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZQQ.TO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for HXQ.TO.
Performance
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZQQ.TO achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly lower than HXQ.TO's 22.84% return. Over the past 10 years, ZQQ.TO has underperformed HXQ.TO with an annualized return of 20.08%, while HXQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.59% annualized return.
ZQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 10.63%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 38.53%
- 3Y*
- 26.42%
- 5Y*
- 16.12%
- 10Y*
- 20.08%
HXQ.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 22.84%
- 6M
- 19.20%
- 1Y
- 43.40%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 21.13%
- 10Y*
- 22.59%
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 19.82% | 18.38% | 24.00% | 52.52% | -33.75% | 26.68% | 45.33% | 37.08% | -2.29% | 31.51% |
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 22.84% | 15.05% | 35.98% | 51.16% | -27.84% | 26.20% | 45.58% | 32.26% | 6.71% | 23.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZQQ.TO and HXQ.TO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between ZQQ.TO and HXQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Communication Services
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Healthcare
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Industrials
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Utilities
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Basic Materials
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Energy
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Financial Services
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Real Estate
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZQQ.TO
HXQ.TO
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.49 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.51 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.25 | 11.28 | -0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | 2.80 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.02 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 1.09 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.08 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than HXQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZQQ.TO and HXQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.39% | -31.60% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.86% | -12.43% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.79% | -22.58% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.39% | -31.60% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.39% | -31.60% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | 0.00% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -5.75% | +0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.86% | -0.43% |
Volatility
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) (ZQQ.TO) and Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) have volatilities of 4.54% and 4.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZQQ.TO | HXQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.63% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 11.81% | +0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.73% | 15.62% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 20.76% | +1.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 20.83% | +1.58% |
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZQQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than HXQ.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZQQ.TO vs. HXQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, while HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZQQ.TO BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity (CAD Hedged) | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.37% | 0.32% | 0.45% | 0.14% | 0.41% | 0.51% | 0.64% | 0.57% | 1.60% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, ZQQ.TO and HXQ.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, HXQ.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZQQ.TO.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Horizons. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZQQ.TO and 0.25% for HXQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZQQ.TO and HXQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer