PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPW.TO achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZSP.TO's 13.62% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPW.TO has underperformed ZSP.TO with an annualized return of 6.04%, while ZSP.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.20% annualized return.


ZPW.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.29%
6M
4.22%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
6.04%

ZSP.TO

1D
0.55%
1M
1.75%
YTD
13.62%
6M
13.06%
1Y
27.01%
3Y*
23.01%
5Y*
16.12%
10Y*
16.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPW.TO
BMO US Put Write ETF
4.29%6.40%13.88%21.83%-4.23%13.18%1.56%-1.21%3.01%-1.78%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
13.62%12.36%35.07%23.30%-12.68%27.54%15.61%24.69%3.28%13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPW.TO and ZSP.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015

0.60

The correlation between ZPW.TO and ZSP.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPW.TO
ZPW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP.TO
ZSP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPW.TOZSP.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.15

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

11.67

-5.55

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the ZSP.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPW.TO and ZSP.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPW.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum ZSP.TO drawdown of -26.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPW.TO and ZSP.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPW.TOZSP.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-26.94%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

-8.61%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-18.95%

+6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

-22.25%

+5.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

-26.94%

+3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.09%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-3.33%

-0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.32%

-0.34%

Volatility

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) is 2.87%, while BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP.TO) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that ZPW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZSP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPW.TOZSP.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.81%

-1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

9.58%

-3.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.22%

12.11%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

15.08%

-4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

16.39%

-4.67%

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPW.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPW.TO vs. ZSP.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than ZSP.TO's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZPW.TO
BMO US Put Write ETF
9.62%9.55%9.18%7.57%8.20%7.24%7.61%7.17%6.61%6.82%7.32%2.32%
ZSP.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF
0.76%0.82%0.94%1.33%1.44%1.15%1.45%1.48%1.68%1.68%2.23%1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPW.TO and ZSP.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPW.TO.

ZPW.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZSP.TO is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZPW.TO and 0.09% for ZSP.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPW.TO and ZSP.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer