PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZPW.TO (BMO US Put Write ETF) and ZNQ.TO (BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPW.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by BMO, while ZNQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. ZPW.TO is actively managed, while ZNQ.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPW.TO returned 9.22%/yr vs 19.23%/yr for ZNQ.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZPW.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZNQ.TO.

Performance

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPW.TO achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 23.99% return.

ZPW.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.26%
YTD
4.29%
6M
4.22%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
6.04%

ZNQ.TO

1D
1.63%
1M
2.62%
YTD
23.99%
6M
23.16%
1Y
39.20%
3Y*
29.08%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZPW.TO
BMO US Put Write ETF		4.29%6.40%13.88%21.83%-4.23%13.18%1.56%-0.19%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF		23.99%14.95%35.84%51.32%-28.06%26.59%44.65%22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPW.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2019

0.56

The correlation between ZPW.TO and ZNQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO US Put Write ETF

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF

Often compared with ZNQ.TO:
ZNQ.TO vs. ZQQ.TOZNQ.TO vs. QQC.TOZNQ.TO vs. HXQ.TOZNQ.TO vs. TEC.TOZNQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZNQ.TO vs. QQQZNQ.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Return for Risk

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZPW.TO
ZPW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZPW.TOZNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.68
2.22

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.31
2.90

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

3.22

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

10.03

-3.91

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPW.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPW.TO and ZNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPW.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.77%, smaller than the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPW.TO and ZNQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZPW.TOZNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.77%

-32.09%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

-12.24%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-22.67%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.57%

-32.09%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.77%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.30%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.06%

-6.59%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

3.92%

-1.94%

Volatility

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Put Write ETF (ZPW.TO) is 2.87%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that ZPW.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZPW.TOZNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

9.27%

-6.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

14.58%

-8.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.22%

17.76%

-10.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.61%

21.15%

-10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.72%

22.46%

-10.74%

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPW.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZPW.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPW.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF		0.20%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPW.TO
BMO US Put Write ETF		9.62%9.55%9.18%7.57%8.20%7.24%7.61%7.17%6.61%6.82%7.32%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZPW.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZNQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZNQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPW.TO.

ZPW.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZNQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZPW.TO and 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPW.TO and ZNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer