PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRW.DE achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than ASWA.DE's -10.58% return.


ZPRW.DE

1D
0.72%
1M
3.83%
YTD
11.85%
6M
15.32%
1Y
31.00%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
10.74%

ASWA.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.41%
YTD
-10.58%
6M
-9.71%
1Y
0.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZPRW.DE
SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF
11.85%35.70%8.86%2.21%
ASWA.DE
HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc
-10.58%26.07%-11.37%-2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRW.DE and ASWA.DE is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023

0.68

The correlation between ZPRW.DE and ASWA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRW.DE
ZPRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ASWA.DE
ASWA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASWA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) and HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRW.DEASWA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.06

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

0.01

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.39

0.03

+12.37

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the ASWA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRW.DE and ASWA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRW.DEASWA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.01

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.04

+0.49

Drawdowns

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, which is greater than ASWA.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRW.DE and ASWA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRW.DEASWA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-30.36%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.27%

-30.36%

+21.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-23.85%

+22.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-8.15%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

10.54%

-8.04%

Volatility

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI Europe Value UCITS ETF (ZPRW.DE) is 4.40%, while HANetf European Green Deal UCITS ETF Acc (ASWA.DE) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that ZPRW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRW.DEASWA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

7.52%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.84%

37.06%

-26.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

33.68%

-20.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.89%

24.72%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

24.72%

-7.18%

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRW.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ASWA.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRW.DE vs. ASWA.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPRW.DE nor ASWA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRW.DE and ASWA.DE have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

ZPRW.DE tracks MSCI Europe Value Exposure Select, while ASWA.DE tracks SGI European Green Deal ESG Screened. They also come from different issuers: State Street and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ZPRW.DE and 0.60% for ASWA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRW.DE and ASWA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer