PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRV.DE is traded in EUR, while FGQD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FGQD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRV.DE achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than FGQD.L's 11.85% return.


ZPRV.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
7.03%
YTD
17.92%
6M
17.41%
1Y
37.90%
3Y*
16.83%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.09%

FGQD.L

1D
0.84%
1M
3.73%
YTD
11.85%
6M
12.72%
1Y
25.62%
3Y*
14.61%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
17.92%2.99%14.07%19.11%-5.40%48.22%-1.86%27.40%-11.77%1.27%
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
11.85%6.30%18.68%13.87%-5.39%31.83%0.64%31.71%-3.46%-16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRV.DE and FGQD.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2017

0.73

The correlation between ZPRV.DE and FGQD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRV.DE
ZPRV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FGQD.L
FGQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPRV.DEFGQD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.45

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.43

3.84

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.11

17.82

+2.28

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRV.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FGQD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRV.DE and FGQD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRV.DE drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than FGQD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRV.DE and FGQD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRV.DEFGQD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.04%

-33.91%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.87%

-6.65%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.14%

-19.10%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.14%

-19.10%

-12.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-7.31%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

1.43%

+0.45%

Volatility

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (ZPRV.DE) and Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF (FGQD.L) have volatilities of 2.97% and 2.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRV.DEFGQD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

2.99%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.66%

7.69%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.70%

10.50%

+5.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.38%

13.08%

+7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.87%

16.24%

+6.63%

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRV.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FGQD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRV.DE vs. FGQD.L - Dividend Comparison

ZPRV.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FGQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGQD.L
Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF
1.80%1.86%2.31%2.78%2.70%2.46%2.60%2.44%2.70%1.10%
ZPRV.DE
SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRV.DE and FGQD.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for FGQD.L.

ZPRV.DE is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while FGQD.L is Global Equities. ZPRV.DE tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted Index, while FGQD.L tracks Fidelity Global Quality Income index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZPRV.DE and 0.40% for FGQD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRV.DE and FGQD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer