PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) and Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRS.DE is traded in EUR, while GLDN.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the GLDN.AX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRS.DE achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly higher than GLDN.AX's 3.99% return.


ZPRS.DE

1D
0.46%
1M
3.86%
YTD
14.70%
6M
15.69%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
14.74%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
9.81%

GLDN.AX

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.51%
YTD
3.99%
6M
6.75%
1Y
30.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZPRS.DE
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
14.70%7.37%13.79%12.65%
GLDN.AX
Ishares Physical Gold ETF
3.99%47.39%33.85%-0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRS.DE and GLDN.AX is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRS.DE
ZPRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ZPRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDN.AX
GLDN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
GLDN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) and Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRS.DEGLDN.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.14

1.57

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.60

3.88

+11.72

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the GLDN.AX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRS.DE and GLDN.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRS.DEGLDN.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

1.15

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.55

-0.95

Drawdowns

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, which is greater than GLDN.AX's maximum drawdown of -18.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRS.DE and GLDN.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRS.DEGLDN.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.22%

-18.99%

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-18.99%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.75%

+16.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.41%

-3.64%

-2.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

7.71%

-5.79%

Volatility

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) is 3.55%, while Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that ZPRS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRS.DEGLDN.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.55%

5.44%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

22.31%

-12.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.83%

25.89%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.58%

20.73%

-4.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

20.73%

-3.47%

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRS.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDN.AX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRS.DE vs. GLDN.AX - Dividend Comparison

ZPRS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GLDN.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM2025
GLDN.AX
Ishares Physical Gold ETF
0.08%0.07%
ZPRS.DE
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRS.DE and GLDN.AX have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDN.AX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDN.AX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPRS.DE.

ZPRS.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while GLDN.AX is Gold. ZPRS.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap, while GLDN.AX tracks LBMA Gold Price PM AUD Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPRS.DE and 0.18% for GLDN.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRS.DE and GLDN.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer