ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
ZPRS.DE (SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ZPRS.DE tracks the MSCI World Small Cap while ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPRS.DE returned 7.87%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZPRS.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.
Performance
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRS.DE achieves a 14.70% return, which is significantly higher than ETLQ.DE's 10.88% return.
ZPRS.DE
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 14.70%
- 6M
- 15.69%
- 1Y
- 30.01%
- 3Y*
- 14.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.87%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRS.DE SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF | 14.70% | 7.37% | 13.79% | 12.57% | -13.88% | 25.10% | 5.40% | 20.06% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.88% | 8.14% | 26.10% | 20.83% | -13.64% | 32.63% | 5.63% | 24.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRS.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2019 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ZPRS.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRS.DE
ETLQ.DE
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPRS.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.39 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.14 | 3.56 | +0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.60 | 14.23 | +1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPRS.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.13 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.92 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.93 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.22%, which is greater than ETLQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRS.DE and ETLQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRS.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.22% | -33.38% | -6.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -6.68% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.49% | -21.58% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -21.58% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.34% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -4.33% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.92% | 1.68% | +0.24% |
Volatility
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRS.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that ZPRS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRS.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 2.68% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.68% | 7.77% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 11.18% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 14.06% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 15.74% | +1.52% |
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRS.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZPRS.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPRS.DE nor ETLQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRS.DE and ETLQ.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPRS.DE.
ZPRS.DE tracks MSCI World Small Cap, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPRS.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPRS.DE and ETLQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer