PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR FTSE EPRA Europe ex UK Real Estate UCITS ETF (ZPRP.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRP.DE achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than CSYZ.DE's 7.36% return.


ZPRP.DE

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
-2.34%
3Y*
9.93%
5Y*
-4.33%
10Y*
0.99%

CSYZ.DE

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
7.36%
6M
6.96%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ZPRP.DE
SPDR FTSE EPRA Europe ex UK Real Estate UCITS ETF
-0.81%6.98%-2.34%19.03%-36.37%10.87%15.36%
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
7.36%-5.02%2.47%4.08%-19.53%36.67%5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRP.DE and CSYZ.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.62

The correlation between ZPRP.DE and CSYZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRP.DE
ZPRP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
ZPRP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CSYZ.DE
CSYZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSYZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FTSE EPRA Europe ex UK Real Estate UCITS ETF (ZPRP.DE) and CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRP.DECSYZ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.10

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

0.80

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

2.28

-2.69

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRP.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the CSYZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRP.DE and CSYZ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRP.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.57

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.00

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.26

-0.18

Drawdowns

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRP.DE drawdown since its inception was -48.69%, which is greater than CSYZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRP.DE and CSYZ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRP.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.69%

-31.21%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.29%

-8.07%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.80%

-20.14%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.69%

-31.21%

-17.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.29%

-15.10%

-11.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.81%

-13.84%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

2.82%

+2.93%

Volatility

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR FTSE EPRA Europe ex UK Real Estate UCITS ETF (ZPRP.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.34% compared to CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD (CSYZ.DE) at 2.84%. This indicates that ZPRP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSYZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRP.DECSYZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

2.84%

+2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

8.54%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

11.29%

+4.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.12%

15.03%

+7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

15.22%

+4.55%

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRP.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSYZ.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRP.DE vs. CSYZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPRP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSYZ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CSYZ.DE
CSIF (IE) FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green Blue UCITS ETF A USD
1.01%1.32%0.00%0.76%3.39%0.21%
ZPRP.DE
SPDR FTSE EPRA Europe ex UK Real Estate UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRP.DE and CSYZ.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSYZ.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSYZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZPRP.DE.

ZPRP.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe ex UK, while CSYZ.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZPRP.DE and 0.25% for CSYZ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRP.DE and CSYZ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer