ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE
ZPRM.DE (State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc)) and YCSH.DE (iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Money Market funds. ZPRM.DE is passively managed, while YCSH.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, ZPRM.DE returned 14.68% vs -0.81% for YCSH.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPRM.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for YCSH.DE.
Performance
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPRM.DE is traded in USD, while YCSH.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the YCSH.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRM.DE achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than YCSH.DE's -1.68% return.
ZPRM.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
YCSH.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZPRM.DE State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.36% | 23.34% | 3.27% |
YCSH.DE iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -1.68% | 15.45% | -1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRM.DE and YCSH.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2024 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRM.DE
YCSH.DE
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) and iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZPRM.DE | YCSH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.98 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | -0.16 | +3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | -0.36 | +12.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than YCSH.DE's maximum drawdown of -4.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRM.DE and YCSH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRM.DE | YCSH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.15% | -4.96% | -19.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -4.96% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -4.21% | +2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -1.54% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 2.24% | -1.06% |
Volatility
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to iShares € Cash UCITS ETF EUR Acc (YCSH.DE) at 1.66%. This indicates that ZPRM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCSH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRM.DE | YCSH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 1.66% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.37% | 4.54% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.78% | 6.30% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 7.47% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 7.47% | +6.23% |
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRM.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than YCSH.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPRM.DE vs. YCSH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPRM.DE nor YCSH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRM.DE and YCSH.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPRM.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for YCSH.DE.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for ZPRM.DE and 0.10% for YCSH.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPRM.DE and YCSH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer