PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Acc) (L8I3.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRM.DE is traded in USD, while L8I3.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the L8I3.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRM.DE achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than L8I3.DE's -1.64% return.


ZPRM.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.34%
6M
5.69%
YTD
6.36%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
12.31%
10Y*

L8I3.DE

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.19%
6M
-1.46%
YTD
-1.64%
1Y
-0.77%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
0.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZPRM.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc)
6.36%23.34%-6.88%29.70%13.58%1.41%-0.25%13.94%
L8I3.DE
Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Acc)
-1.64%15.39%-2.24%6.43%-5.61%-8.53%9.03%-0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRM.DE and L8I3.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.31

The correlation between ZPRM.DE and L8I3.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRM.DE
ZPRM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ZPRM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

L8I3.DE
L8I3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
L8I3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
L8I3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
L8I3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
L8I3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
L8I3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) and Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Acc) (L8I3.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPRM.DEL8I3.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

0.98

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

-0.16

+3.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.41

-0.34

+12.75

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the L8I3.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRM.DE and L8I3.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, smaller than the maximum L8I3.DE drawdown of -40.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRM.DE and L8I3.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRM.DEL8I3.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-40.06%

+15.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-4.94%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-7.54%

-8.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.56%

-19.86%

+4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-20.80%

+19.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-21.94%

+17.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

2.25%

-1.07%

Volatility

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Amundi EUR Overnight Return UCITS ETF (Acc) (L8I3.DE) at 1.64%. This indicates that ZPRM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L8I3.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRM.DEL8I3.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

1.64%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

4.53%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.78%

6.27%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.70%

7.59%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.70%

7.22%

+6.48%

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRM.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than L8I3.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPRM.DE vs. L8I3.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPRM.DE nor L8I3.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRM.DE and L8I3.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRM.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for L8I3.DE.

ZPRM.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 1-3 Month Index (MXN Hedged), while L8I3.DE tracks Solactive EUR Overnight Return Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for ZPRM.DE and 0.10% for L8I3.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRM.DE and L8I3.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer