ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE
ZPRM.DE (State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc)) and C101.DE (Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Money Market funds - ZPRM.DE tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 1-3 Month Index (MXN Hedged) while C101.DE tracks the Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPRM.DE returned 12.31%/yr vs 3.56%/yr for C101.DE. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. ZPRM.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for C101.DE.
Performance
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZPRM.DE is traded in USD, while C101.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the C101.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRM.DE achieves a 6.36% return, which is significantly higher than C101.DE's 1.90% return.
ZPRM.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 5.69%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 9.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.31%
- 10Y*
- —
C101.DE
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 4.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- 2.35%
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPRM.DE State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) | 6.36% | 23.34% | -6.88% | 29.70% | 13.58% | 1.41% | -0.25% | 13.94% |
C101.DE Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) | 1.90% | 4.57% | 5.03% | 4.70% | 1.91% | -0.20% | 0.31% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRM.DE and C101.DE is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019 | -0.13 |
The correlation between ZPRM.DE and C101.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to -0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPRM.DE
C101.DE
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) and Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZPRM.DE | C101.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.18 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.11 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | 12.34 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRM.DE drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, which is greater than C101.DE's maximum drawdown of -5.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRM.DE and C101.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPRM.DE | C101.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.15% | -5.03% | -19.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -1.26% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -1.58% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.56% | -1.58% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -0.32% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -1.92% | -2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 0.32% | +0.86% |
Volatility
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPRM.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) (C101.DE) at 1.48%. This indicates that ZPRM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than C101.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZPRM.DE | C101.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.47% | 1.48% | +0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.37% | 3.06% | +3.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.78% | 4.10% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 4.22% | +6.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 4.48% | +9.22% |
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRM.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than C101.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZPRM.DE vs. C101.DE - Dividend Comparison
ZPRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while C101.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C101.DE Amundi USD Fed Funds Rate UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.31% | 4.51% | 5.40% | 4.63% | 0.37% | 0.14% | 1.13% | 1.83% | 1.52% |
ZPRM.DE State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill MXN Hdg UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZPRM.DE and C101.DE have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPRM.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPRM.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for C101.DE.
ZPRM.DE tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Bills 1-3 Month Index (MXN Hedged), while C101.DE tracks Solactive Fed Funds Effective Rate Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for ZPRM.DE and 0.10% for C101.DE.
Find the right allocation for ZPRM.DE and C101.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer