PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ZPRG.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZPRG.DE is traded in EUR, while IBTU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBTU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRG.DE achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than IBTU.L's 3.15% return.


ZPRG.DE

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.55%
YTD
7.85%
6M
8.79%
1Y
14.70%
3Y*
11.37%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
6.23%

IBTU.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.32%
YTD
3.15%
6M
2.50%
1Y
2.86%
3Y*
2.25%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZPRG.DE
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
7.85%5.03%13.19%3.49%-1.05%25.02%-17.50%14.12%
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
3.15%-8.05%12.26%1.77%7.31%7.58%-7.43%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRG.DE and IBTU.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2019

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRG.DE
ZPRG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ZPRG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTU.L
IBTU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ZPRG.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRG.DEIBTU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.08

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

0.77

+1.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.62

1.75

+6.87

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRG.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the IBTU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRG.DE and IBTU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRG.DEIBTU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.45

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.34

+0.11

Drawdowns

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRG.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, which is greater than IBTU.L's maximum drawdown of -13.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRG.DE and IBTU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRG.DEIBTU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.07%

-13.35%

-28.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-3.69%

-1.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.07%

-11.54%

-5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

-11.84%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.80%

-6.16%

+5.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.59%

-5.82%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

1.59%

+0.11%

Volatility

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS (ZPRG.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IBTU.L) at 1.23%. This indicates that ZPRG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRG.DEIBTU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

1.23%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.56%

4.33%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.36%

6.37%

+2.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

7.59%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.93%

7.31%

+7.62%

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRG.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTU.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRG.DE vs. IBTU.L - Dividend Comparison

ZPRG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than IBTU.L's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTU.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.07%4.43%6.82%3.99%0.44%0.10%1.28%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZPRG.DE
SPDR S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats UCITS
3.87%4.25%3.73%4.22%4.49%3.58%3.98%3.44%3.95%3.36%3.62%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRG.DE and IBTU.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBTU.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBTU.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPRG.DE.

ZPRG.DE is categorized as Global Equity Income, while IBTU.L is Government Bonds. ZPRG.DE tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Quality Income Index, while IBTU.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPRG.DE and 0.07% for IBTU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRG.DE and IBTU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer