PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (ZPRC.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPRC.DE achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than SYBM.DE's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPRC.DE has outperformed SYBM.DE with an annualized return of 8.83%, while SYBM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.


ZPRC.DE

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.04%
YTD
19.28%
6M
20.49%
1Y
33.63%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
8.83%

SYBM.DE

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.37%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.35%
1Y
3.38%
3Y*
2.54%
5Y*
1.45%
10Y*
1.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPRC.DE
SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF
19.28%11.36%13.71%10.51%-15.60%5.44%24.70%16.78%-1.19%-1.51%
SYBM.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF
0.49%2.47%3.13%5.78%-4.57%-0.95%-5.71%14.77%-1.49%0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPRC.DE and SYBM.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014

0.45

The correlation between ZPRC.DE and SYBM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (5 years) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPRC.DE
ZPRC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZPRC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPRC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPRC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPRC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPRC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBM.DE
SYBM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SYBM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (ZPRC.DE) and SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPRC.DESYBM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.12

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.98

0.87

+6.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.17

2.69

+22.48

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPRC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is higher than the SYBM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPRC.DE and SYBM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPRC.DESYBM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

0.67

+2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.21

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.22

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.23

+0.58

Drawdowns

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPRC.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.49%, which is greater than SYBM.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRC.DE and SYBM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPRC.DESYBM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.49%

-19.16%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.80%

-3.90%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.00%

-7.62%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.71%

-8.64%

-12.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.49%

-16.36%

-7.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-3.09%

+2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.01%

-7.10%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

1.26%

+0.07%

Volatility

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF (ZPRC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.94% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF (SYBM.DE) at 1.51%. This indicates that ZPRC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYBM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPRC.DESYBM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.94%

1.51%

+2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

4.22%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.45%

5.07%

+6.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.54%

6.94%

+3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.76%

7.82%

+2.94%

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPRC.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SYBM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPRC.DE vs. SYBM.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPRC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than SYBM.DE's 5.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SYBM.DE
SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond UCITS ETF
5.07%5.01%4.77%4.21%4.29%3.89%4.12%4.34%4.13%5.01%4.30%5.26%
ZPRC.DE
SPDR Refinitiv Global Convertible Bond UCITS ETF
0.57%0.68%0.46%0.23%0.24%0.16%0.32%0.41%0.36%0.51%0.61%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPRC.DE and SYBM.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPRC.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPRC.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SYBM.DE.

ZPRC.DE is categorized as Convertible Bonds, while SYBM.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. ZPRC.DE tracks Refinitiv Qualified Global Convertible, while SYBM.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Currency Liquid Government Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ZPRC.DE and 0.55% for SYBM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPRC.DE and SYBM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer