PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPR.TO achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than VVL.TO's 19.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPR.TO has underperformed VVL.TO with an annualized return of 8.16%, while VVL.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.


ZPR.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
2.00%
6M
8.48%
YTD
8.97%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
19.91%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
8.16%
ALL TIME*
4.09%

VVL.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.41%
6M
13.59%
YTD
19.93%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
19.80%
5Y*
15.45%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.10MCA$1.04MCA$875.29K
CA$1.16MCA$1.25MCA$1.37M

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
8.97%18.58%26.58%7.21%-17.66%23.77%6.00%1.94%-9.77%14.71%
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
19.93%18.01%15.01%16.57%0.50%29.77%-3.29%13.44%-9.39%12.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPR.TO and VVL.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2016

0.30

The correlation between ZPR.TO and VVL.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZPR.TO
ZPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

VVL.TO
VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPR.TOVVL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.77

1.44

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.39

3.88

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

36.65

15.44

+21.22

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.72, which is higher than the VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPR.TO and VVL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.72%, roughly equal to the maximum VVL.TO drawdown of -43.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPR.TO and VVL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPR.TOVVL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.72%

-43.88%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-8.83%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-18.07%

+9.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.06%

-18.07%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.13%

-43.88%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.33%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.19%

-5.71%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

2.22%

-1.79%

Volatility

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) is 0.80%, while Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF (VVL.TO) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that ZPR.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPR.TOVVL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

3.73%

-2.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.66%

9.47%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

13.85%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.30%

16.10%

-7.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.41%

18.78%

-7.37%

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPR.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VVL.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPR.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, more than VVL.TO's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VVL.TO
Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF
1.58%1.89%2.19%2.69%2.57%1.50%1.70%2.65%2.15%1.35%0.60%0.00%
ZPR.TO
BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF
5.08%4.86%4.93%5.92%5.97%4.66%5.48%5.09%4.82%4.08%5.14%5.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPR.TO and VVL.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVL.TO is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVL.TO is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ZPR.TO.

ZPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock, while VVL.TO is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPR.TO and 0.38% for VVL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPR.TO and VVL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer