ZPR.TO vs. GMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZPR.TO (BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF) and GMAR (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPR.TO is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Solactive Laddered Canadian Preferred Share Index, while GMAR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by FT Vest. ZPR.TO is passively managed, while GMAR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ZPR.TO returned 20.00%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for GMAR. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZPR.TO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for GMAR.

Performance

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ZPR.TO is traded in CAD, while GMAR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GMAR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPR.TO achieves a 6.02% return, which is significantly lower than GMAR's 9.26% return.

ZPR.TO

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 6.02%
• 6M: 7.47%
• 1Y: 18.85%
• 3Y*: 20.00%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: 8.11%

GMAR

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 3.54%
• YTD: 9.26%
• 6M: 8.24%
• 1Y: 16.79%
• 3Y*: 13.54%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF	6.02%	18.58%	26.58%	6.92%
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	9.26%	4.27%	21.78%	8.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPR.TO and GMAR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2023	0.15

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZPR.TO	GMAR
Utilities	100.0%	2.3%
Basic Materials	-	1.8%
Communication Services	-	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.9%
Energy	-	3.5%
Financial Services	-	11.9%
Healthcare	-	8.4%
Industrials	-	8.1%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	36.2%

Return for Risk

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPR.TO

ZPR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 97
ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ZPR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZPR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ZPR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZPR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GMAR

GMAR Risk / Return Rank: 97
GMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
GMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
GMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
GMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZPR.TO	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.38	3.09	+1.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.74	4.39	+2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.95	1.64	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.67	5.96	+1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	45.38	20.21	+25.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.38, which is higher than the GMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPR.TO and GMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZPR.TO	GMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.38	3.09	+1.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	1.83	-1.48

Drawdowns

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPR.TO drawdown since its inception was -44.92%, which is greater than GMAR's maximum drawdown of -10.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPR.TO and GMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZPR.TO	GMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.92%	-10.93%	-33.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.47%	-2.83%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.75%	-10.93%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.59%	0.00%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.37%	-1.12%	-8.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	0.83%	-0.41%

Volatility

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Volatility Comparison

BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March (GMAR) at 0.90%. This indicates that ZPR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZPR.TO	GMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.14%	0.90%	+0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.78%	4.08%	-1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.33%	5.46%	-1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.33%	7.50%	+0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.50%	7.50%	+4.00%

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPR.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GMAR's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZPR.TO vs. GMAR - Dividend Comparison

ZPR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, while GMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GMAR FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF	5.07%	4.86%	4.93%	5.92%	5.97%	4.66%	5.48%	5.24%	4.70%	3.94%	4.97%	5.32%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZPR.TO and GMAR in my portfolio?

ZPR.TO and GMAR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZPR.TO or GMAR?

On fees, ZPR.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZPR.TO or GMAR?

ZPR.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for GMAR.

What is the main difference between ZPR.TO and GMAR?

ZPR.TO is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while GMAR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: BMO and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ZPR.TO and 0.85% for GMAR.