PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZPL.TO (BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF) and ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZPL.TO is a Government Bonds fund managed by BMO, while ZDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Over the past 10 years, ZPL.TO returned 0.48%/yr vs 12.20%/yr for ZDV.TO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZPL.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPL.TO achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than ZDV.TO's 19.50% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPL.TO has underperformed ZDV.TO with an annualized return of 0.48%, while ZDV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.20% annualized return.

ZPL.TO

1D
0.08%
1M
0.46%
YTD
3.53%
6M
3.10%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
2.13%
5Y*
-2.27%
10Y*
0.48%

ZDV.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.72%
YTD
19.50%
6M
19.28%
1Y
40.41%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
15.82%
10Y*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPL.TO
BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF		3.53%-1.77%1.41%8.19%-22.32%-4.72%11.32%13.74%-1.69%7.97%
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF		19.50%28.82%16.83%8.14%-1.66%28.75%-3.51%22.89%-10.76%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPL.TO and ZDV.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

-0.03

The correlation between ZPL.TO and ZDV.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF

BMO Canadian Dividend ETF

Often compared with ZDV.TO:
ZDV.TO vs. VDY.TOZDV.TO vs. XEI.TOZDV.TO vs. XDIV.TOZDV.TO vs. ZWC.TOZDV.TO vs. ZCN.TOZDV.TO vs. XDV.TOZDV.TO vs. ZDY.TO

Return for Risk

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZPL.TO
ZPL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ZPL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO
ZDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZPL.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZPL.TOZDV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.38
4.70

-4.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.57
6.38

-5.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.92

-0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

7.49

-6.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

38.44

-37.07

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ZDV.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPL.TO and ZDV.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, smaller than the maximum ZDV.TO drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPL.TO and ZDV.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZPL.TOZDV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-43.20%

+9.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.91%

-5.42%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

-9.04%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.61%

-16.61%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.96%

-43.20%

+9.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.82%

-0.97%

-18.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.14%

-4.92%

-6.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

1.05%

+1.43%

Volatility

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZPL.TO) is 2.44%, while BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that ZPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZPL.TOZDV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.81%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

7.29%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.63%

8.65%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

10.59%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.43%

14.93%

-3.50%

Dividends

ZPL.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than ZDV.TO's 2.69% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZDV.TO
BMO Canadian Dividend ETF		2.69%3.07%3.82%4.39%4.38%3.88%4.79%4.53%5.28%4.04%4.31%4.95%
ZPL.TO
BMO Long Provincial Bond Index ETF		3.53%3.84%3.88%4.16%4.31%3.22%2.97%3.20%3.44%3.28%3.59%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZPL.TO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZPL.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while ZDV.TO is Canada Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPL.TO and ZDV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer