PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPH.TO achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than ZNQ.TO's 23.99% return.


ZPH.TO

1D
0.30%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
-0.15%
6M
-0.22%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*

ZNQ.TO

1D
1.63%
1M
2.62%
YTD
23.99%
6M
23.16%
1Y
39.20%
3Y*
29.08%
5Y*
19.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZPH.TO
BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF
-0.15%9.47%4.21%22.61%-10.37%13.57%2.43%1.39%
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
23.99%14.95%35.84%51.32%-28.06%26.59%44.65%22.53%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPH.TO and ZNQ.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2019

0.49

The correlation between ZPH.TO and ZNQ.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPH.TO
ZPH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) and BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPH.TOZNQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.40

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

3.22

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

10.03

-6.43

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPH.TO and ZNQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPH.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.38%, roughly equal to the maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown of -32.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPH.TO and ZNQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPH.TOZNQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.38%

-32.09%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-12.24%

+6.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.83%

-22.67%

+10.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-32.09%

+13.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-0.30%

-1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-6.59%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

3.92%

-2.32%

Volatility

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF (ZPH.TO) is 2.33%, while BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that ZPH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZNQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPH.TOZNQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

9.27%

-6.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.44%

14.58%

-9.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

17.76%

-11.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.16%

21.15%

-9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.61%

22.46%

-9.85%

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPH.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZNQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPH.TO vs. ZNQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZPH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than ZNQ.TO's 0.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
0.20%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%0.00%0.00%
ZPH.TO
BMO US Put Write Hedged to CAD ETF
10.61%10.06%9.95%8.18%8.83%7.27%7.67%7.26%6.98%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPH.TO and ZNQ.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZNQ.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZNQ.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZPH.TO.

ZPH.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while ZNQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ZPH.TO and 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPH.TO and ZNQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer