ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

ZPDW.DE (State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF) and PR1J.DE (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Japan Equities funds - ZPDW.DE tracks the MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to EUR Index while PR1J.DE tracks the Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZPDW.DE returned 19.84%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for PR1J.DE. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZPDW.DE charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1J.DE.

Performance

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDW.DE achieves a 21.38% return, which is significantly higher than PR1J.DE's 19.42% return.

ZPDW.DE

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: 1.95%
• 6M: 21.11%
• YTD: 21.38%
• 1Y: 48.83%
• 3Y*: 26.19%
• 5Y*: 19.84%
• 10Y*: 15.28%

PR1J.DE

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 3.09%
• 6M: 19.38%
• YTD: 19.42%
• 1Y: 34.75%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZPDW.DE State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF	21.38%	27.50%	22.78%	33.59%	-5.96%	12.63%	7.91%	11.68%
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)	19.42%	12.92%	13.38%	16.35%	-11.58%	10.23%	5.10%	-99.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019	0.84

The correlation between ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDW.DE

ZPDW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 90
ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
ZPDW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
ZPDW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ZPDW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ZPDW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 91

PR1J.DE

PR1J.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PR1J.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PR1J.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
PR1J.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
PR1J.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZPDW.DE	PR1J.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	1.78	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.36	2.60	+0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.34	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.04	3.36	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.98	11.07	+5.91

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is higher than the PR1J.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDW.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.37%, smaller than the maximum PR1J.DE drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZPDW.DE	PR1J.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.37%	-99.34%	+64.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	-10.29%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.70%	-16.25%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.70%	-18.66%	-3.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.76%	-98.38%	+95.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	-97.50%	+90.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	3.12%	-0.25%

Volatility

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Volatility Comparison

State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.74% compared to Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) at 5.88%. This indicates that ZPDW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZPDW.DE	PR1J.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	5.88%	+0.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	15.67%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.26%	19.41%	+0.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	16.63%	+2.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.49%	40.23%	-21.74%

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDW.DE has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1J.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZPDW.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPDW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)	1.47%	1.75%	1.91%	1.90%	2.21%	1.80%	1.73%	1.87%
ZPDW.DE State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, ZPDW.DE or PR1J.DE?

On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZPDW.DE or PR1J.DE?

PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZPDW.DE.

What is the main difference between ZPDW.DE and PR1J.DE?

ZPDW.DE tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to EUR Index, while PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for ZPDW.DE and 0.05% for PR1J.DE.