PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDS.DE achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than XZEC.DE's 3.52% return.


ZPDS.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.22%
1Y
0.43%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
6.84%

XZEC.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
3.79%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.05%
1Y
11.05%
3Y*
2.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ZPDS.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
7.50%-8.90%20.38%-5.08%5.38%16.39%
XZEC.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF
3.52%1.95%3.52%16.28%-16.49%0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDS.DE and XZEC.DE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDS.DE
ZPDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

XZEC.DE
XZEC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XZEC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPDS.DEXZEC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.13

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.98

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

2.63

-2.53

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the XZEC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDS.DE and XZEC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPDS.DEXZEC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

0.73

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.06

+0.42

Drawdowns

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.29%, smaller than the maximum XZEC.DE drawdown of -30.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDS.DE and XZEC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDS.DEXZEC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.29%

-30.22%

+6.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-11.27%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.44%

-23.79%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-4.58%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-10.22%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

4.19%

+0.08%

Volatility

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened UCITS ETF (XZEC.DE) at 4.04%. This indicates that ZPDS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XZEC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDS.DEXZEC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

4.04%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

11.07%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

15.07%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

20.02%

-6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

20.02%

-6.04%

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDS.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XZEC.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDS.DE vs. XZEC.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDS.DE nor XZEC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDS.DE and XZEC.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for XZEC.DE.

ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector, while XZEC.DE tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Discretionary ESG Screened 20-35 Select. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDS.DE and 0.17% for XZEC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDS.DE and XZEC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer