PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDS.DE achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than WELC.DE's -1.47% return.


ZPDS.DE

1D
0.01%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.22%
1Y
0.43%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
6.84%

WELC.DE

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
-1.47%
6M
-1.22%
1Y
6.53%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZPDS.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
7.50%-8.90%20.38%-5.08%1.59%
WELC.DE
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
-1.47%-5.06%29.51%30.69%-8.13%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDS.DE and WELC.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.16

The correlation between ZPDS.DE and WELC.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDS.DE
ZPDS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

WELC.DE
WELC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
WELC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
WELC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPDS.DEWELC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.08

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.05

0.44

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.10

1.21

-1.11

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the WELC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDS.DE and WELC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPDS.DEWELC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

0.39

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.60

-0.12

Drawdowns

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDS.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.29%, smaller than the maximum WELC.DE drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDS.DE and WELC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDS.DEWELC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.29%

-28.15%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-14.64%

+5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.44%

-28.15%

+12.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-10.11%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.14%

-6.71%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.27%

5.38%

-1.11%

Volatility

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELC.DE) at 4.86%. This indicates that ZPDS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WELC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDS.DEWELC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

4.86%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.46%

12.32%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

16.52%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.37%

18.03%

-4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.98%

18.03%

-4.05%

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDS.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELC.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDS.DE vs. WELC.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPDS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.


PositionTTM202520242023
WELC.DE
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.81%0.93%0.83%0.73%
ZPDS.DE
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDS.DE and WELC.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELC.DE.

ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector, while WELC.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDS.DE and 0.18% for WELC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDS.DE and WELC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer