PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDM.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDM.DE achieves a 13.05% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM.DE's 21.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZPDM.DE having a 9.03% annualized return and SPYM.DE not far behind at 8.60%.


ZPDM.DE

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.06%
6M
4.76%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
18.63%
3Y*
7.66%
5Y*
6.76%
10Y*
9.03%

SPYM.DE

1D
-1.39%
1M
-5.08%
6M
12.97%
YTD
21.77%
1Y
38.45%
3Y*
19.46%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPDM.DE
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)
13.05%-1.09%5.46%8.56%-7.02%39.56%8.20%25.61%-11.15%8.19%
SPYM.DE
SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF
21.77%19.06%14.05%6.05%-14.90%5.28%6.27%22.31%-11.26%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDM.DE and SPYM.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.57

The correlation between ZPDM.DE and SPYM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDM.DE
ZPDM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ZPDM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM.DE
SPYM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDM.DE) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZPDM.DESPYM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

3.69

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.48

10.99

-5.51

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the SPYM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDM.DE and SPYM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDM.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum SPYM.DE drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDM.DE and SPYM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDM.DESPYM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-44.83%

+9.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-10.38%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.39%

-18.95%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.39%

-23.25%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-31.69%

-3.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.11%

-9.45%

+6.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-17.58%

+10.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

3.49%

-0.10%

Volatility

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (ZPDM.DE) is 5.17%, while SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (SPYM.DE) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that ZPDM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDM.DESPYM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

8.56%

-3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.66%

17.83%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

20.33%

-4.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.29%

17.33%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.51%

18.53%

+0.98%

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDM.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPYM.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDM.DE vs. SPYM.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZPDM.DE nor SPYM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDM.DE and SPYM.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDM.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDM.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

ZPDM.DE is categorized as Materials, while SPYM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. ZPDM.DE tracks S&P Materials Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SPYM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDM.DE and 0.18% for SPYM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDM.DE and SPYM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer