PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDK.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELR.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDK.DE achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than WELR.DE's 3.18% return.


ZPDK.DE

1D
1.45%
1M
-2.27%
YTD
3.41%
6M
2.07%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

WELR.DE

1D
0.97%
1M
0.72%
YTD
3.18%
6M
1.21%
1Y
21.19%
3Y*
21.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ZPDK.DE
SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF
3.41%13.23%39.09%48.24%-9.50%
WELR.DE
Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist
3.18%15.85%35.02%46.75%-6.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDK.DE and WELR.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.90

The correlation between ZPDK.DE and WELR.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDK.DE
ZPDK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ZPDK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

WELR.DE
WELR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WELR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WELR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDK.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPDK.DEWELR.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

1.44

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

4.45

+3.46

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the WELR.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDK.DE and WELR.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPDK.DEWELR.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.35

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

1.32

-0.63

Drawdowns

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDK.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.98%, which is greater than WELR.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDK.DE and WELR.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDK.DEWELR.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.98%

-25.22%

-11.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-14.70%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-25.22%

+3.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-2.48%

-1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-4.28%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

4.75%

-2.38%

Volatility

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P U.S. Communication Services Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDK.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Communication Services ESG UCITS ETF EUR Dist (WELR.DE) have volatilities of 4.24% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDK.DEWELR.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.20%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.60%

10.86%

-1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

15.63%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

18.26%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

18.26%

+1.22%

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDK.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than WELR.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZPDK.DE vs. WELR.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPDK.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WELR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ZPDK.DE and WELR.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, ZPDK.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDK.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for WELR.DE.

ZPDK.DE tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Daily Capped 25/20, while WELR.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Communication Services. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDK.DE and 0.18% for WELR.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDK.DE and WELR.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer