PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZPDH.DE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly higher than EHLT.DE's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, ZPDH.DE has outperformed EHLT.DE with an annualized return of 8.92%, while EHLT.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.72% annualized return.


ZPDH.DE

1D
2.83%
1M
5.48%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
8.92%

EHLT.DE

1D
3.08%
1M
1.35%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
-0.83%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
1.80%
5Y*
4.71%
10Y*
5.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZPDH.DE
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
-1.12%1.73%8.46%-1.73%3.31%37.77%1.69%24.37%9.07%6.98%
EHLT.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist
-2.49%7.09%4.20%4.76%-4.33%24.01%-2.02%32.89%-1.18%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ZPDH.DE and EHLT.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.63

The correlation between ZPDH.DE and EHLT.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (3 years) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZPDH.DE
ZPDH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

EHLT.DE
EHLT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EHLT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
EHLT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) and Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZPDH.DEEHLT.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

0.40

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.95

0.89

+2.05

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZPDH.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the EHLT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZPDH.DE and EHLT.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZPDH.DEEHLT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.30

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.30

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.37

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.56

-0.10

Drawdowns

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZPDH.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.61%, roughly equal to the maximum EHLT.DE drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDH.DE and EHLT.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZPDH.DEEHLT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.61%

-26.14%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.77%

-12.46%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.64%

-26.14%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.64%

-26.14%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.61%

-26.14%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.28%

-11.58%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-6.90%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

5.62%

-1.21%

Volatility

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDH.DE) is 5.13%, while Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist (EHLT.DE) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that ZPDH.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EHLT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZPDH.DEEHLT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

5.56%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

11.62%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.63%

16.76%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

16.55%

-2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.19%

-0.42%

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZPDH.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EHLT.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZPDH.DE vs. EHLT.DE - Dividend Comparison

ZPDH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EHLT.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EHLT.DE
Lyxor STOXX Europe 600 Healthcare UCITS ETF Dist
1.33%1.30%1.78%0.00%2.28%1.89%2.32%1.88%2.32%0.49%
ZPDH.DE
SPDR S&P US Health Care Select Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZPDH.DE and EHLT.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZPDH.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZPDH.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EHLT.DE.

ZPDH.DE tracks S&P Health Care Select Sector, while EHLT.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Health Care. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ZPDH.DE and 0.30% for EHLT.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZPDH.DE and EHLT.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer