ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE).
ZPDF.DE and QDVH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPDF.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Financials Select Sector. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. QDVH.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials. It was launched on Nov 20, 2015. Both ZPDF.DE and QDVH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDF.DE SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF | -8.52% | 3.01% | 37.12% | 8.46% | -6.12% | 48.31% | -12.18% | 35.27% | -10.30% | 7.53% |
QDVH.DE iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | -8.53% | 3.01% | 37.13% | 8.44% | -6.23% | 48.50% | -12.20% | 35.41% | -10.71% | 7.92% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZPDF.DE having a -8.52% return and QDVH.DE slightly lower at -8.53%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZPDF.DE having a 11.96% annualized return and QDVH.DE not far ahead at 11.98%.
ZPDF.DE
- 1D
- -13.21%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -8.52%
- 6M
- -5.01%
- 1Y
- -5.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
QDVH.DE
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -8.53%
- 6M
- -4.97%
- 1Y
- -5.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.81%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ZPDF.DE and QDVH.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ZPDF.DE
QDVH.DE
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZPDF.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | -0.30 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | -0.28 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.96 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | -0.02 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZPDF.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | -0.30 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.52 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDF.DE and QDVH.DE is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDF.DE nor QDVH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.38%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVH.DE drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDF.DE and QDVH.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZPDF.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.38% | -42.39% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -12.76% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.67% | -21.72% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.38% | -42.39% | +0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.52% | -13.55% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.71% | -7.85% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 4.76% | -0.03% |
Volatility
ZPDF.DE vs. QDVH.DE - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Financials Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDF.DE) has a higher volatility of 21.85% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVH.DE) at 4.34%. This indicates that ZPDF.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDVH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZPDF.DE | QDVH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.85% | 4.34% | +17.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.60% | 10.75% | +12.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.82% | 19.63% | +9.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 18.32% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 20.99% | +1.44% |