ZOCT vs. ZJUN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ZOCT (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October) and ZJUN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ZOCT returned 7.43% vs 6.47% for ZJUN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

ZOCT vs. ZJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZOCT achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly higher than ZJUN's 2.42% return.

ZOCT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.82%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZJUN

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.00%
• 1Y: 6.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZOCT vs. ZJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZOCT Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October	2.66%	4.65%
ZJUN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June	2.42%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between ZOCT and ZJUN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

ZOCT vs. ZJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZOCT

ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 93
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZOCT vs. ZJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr June (ZJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZOCT	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.36	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.45	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.73	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.12	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.87	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZOCT	ZJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.91	3.55	-1.63

Drawdowns

ZOCT vs. ZJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZOCT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, which is greater than ZJUN's maximum drawdown of -1.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZOCT and ZJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZOCT	ZJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-1.08%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.46%	-1.08%	-0.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.34%	-0.08%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZOCT	ZJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.69%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.22%	1.83%	+0.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.05%	1.83%	+1.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.05%	1.83%	+1.22%

ZOCT vs. ZJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZOCT and ZJUN have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

ZOCT vs. ZJUN - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZOCT nor ZJUN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZOCT and ZJUN in my portfolio?

ZOCT and ZJUN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZOCT or ZJUN?

On 1-year performance, ZOCT leads with 7.43% vs 6.47% for ZJUN. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZOCT or ZJUN?

Over the 1-year period, ZOCT has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 6.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZOCT or ZJUN?

ZOCT and ZJUN have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZOCT or ZJUN?

ZOCT and ZJUN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.