PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZOCT vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZOCT achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than SFLR's 5.55% return.


ZOCT

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.82%
YTD
2.64%
6M
2.94%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SFLR

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.11%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.78%
1Y
19.44%
3Y*
16.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZOCT and SFLR is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

0.81

The correlation between ZOCT and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZOCT vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZOCTSFLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.42

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

2.87

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.15

11.73

+12.42

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZOCT Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZOCT and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZOCTSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29

2.20

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

1.71

+0.19

Drawdowns

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZOCT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum SFLR drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZOCT and SFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZOCTSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-12.13%

+8.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.46%

-6.79%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.38%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.34%

-1.74%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

1.66%

-1.36%

Volatility

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) is 0.30%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 1.87%. This indicates that ZOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZOCTSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.30%

1.87%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

6.46%

-4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22%

8.89%

-6.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

10.15%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.04%

10.15%

-7.11%

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZOCT vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

ZOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.32%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%
ZOCT
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZOCT and SFLR have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFLR has higher volatility (1.87%) compared to ZOCT (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZOCT dropped -3.18% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

On 1-year performance, SFLR leads with 19.44% vs 7.26% for ZOCT. On fees, ZOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZOCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 19.44% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.00% for ZOCT.

ZOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZOCT and 0.89% for SFLR.

ZOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZOCT and SFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer