PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZOCT vs. KAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZOCT achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than KAPR's 3.19% return.


ZOCT

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KAPR

1D
0.62%
1M
1.14%
YTD
3.19%
6M
5.99%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZOCT vs. KAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZOCT and KAPR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

ZOCT vs. KAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

KAPR
KAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
KAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZOCTKAPRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.72

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.47

+0.47

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.10

+1.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.90

12.86

+2.04

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the KAPR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZOCT and KAPR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZOCTKAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.72

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.73

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between ZOCT and KAPR is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZOCT nor KAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZOCT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum KAPR drawdown of -16.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZOCT and KAPR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZOCTKAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-16.91%

+13.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-8.39%

+6.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

0.00%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-4.02%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

1.37%

-0.94%

Volatility

ZOCT vs. KAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) is 1.06%, while Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - April (KAPR) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that ZOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZOCTKAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.70%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

3.93%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

10.19%

-6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.14%

11.77%

-8.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.14%

11.72%

-8.58%