PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZOCT vs. BUFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ZOCT
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October
-0.33%6.24%0.68%
BUFD
FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF
-0.60%10.66%2.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZOCT achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly higher than BUFD's -0.60% return.


ZOCT

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
-0.33%
6M
0.63%
1Y
6.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUFD

1D
0.25%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
1.46%
1Y
12.41%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
6.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZOCT vs. BUFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZOCT vs. BUFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZOCT
ZOCT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ZOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ZOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFD
BUFD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
BUFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) and FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZOCTBUFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.99

1.38

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.04

+0.90

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.90

+1.46

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.90

10.38

+4.52

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZOCT Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the BUFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZOCT and BUFD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZOCTBUFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.38

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.87

+0.53

Correlation

The correlation between ZOCT and BUFD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZOCT nor BUFD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZOCT drawdown since its inception was -3.18%, smaller than the maximum BUFD drawdown of -10.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZOCT and BUFD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZOCTBUFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-10.75%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-6.57%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.95%

-1.72%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-2.03%

+1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

1.20%

-0.77%

Volatility

ZOCT vs. BUFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr October (ZOCT) is 1.06%, while FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that ZOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZOCTBUFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

2.68%

-1.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.70%

4.10%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.20%

9.03%

-5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.14%

7.71%

-4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.14%

7.63%

-4.49%