PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ZNQ.TO is traded in CAD, while ZSP-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ZSP-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZNQ.TO achieves a 22.76% return, which is significantly higher than ZSP-U.TO's 11.99% return.


ZNQ.TO

1D
0.25%
1M
13.05%
YTD
22.76%
6M
18.72%
1Y
42.93%
3Y*
29.76%
5Y*
20.92%
10Y*

ZSP-U.TO

1D
-0.20%
1M
7.23%
YTD
11.99%
6M
9.98%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
16.30%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
22.76%14.60%35.84%51.32%-28.06%26.59%44.65%22.90%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
11.99%11.48%34.63%22.72%-13.06%26.97%15.66%16.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ZNQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2019

0.81

The correlation between ZNQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZNQ.TO
ZNQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZNQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ZSP-U.TO
ZSP-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZSP-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) and BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZNQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.24

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.86

12.46

-1.60

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZNQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is comparable to the ZSP-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZNQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZNQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.46

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

1.10

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

1.20

-0.14

Drawdowns

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZNQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, which is greater than ZSP-U.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZNQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZNQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.09%

-27.34%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.50%

-8.83%

-3.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.67%

-18.89%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.09%

-22.19%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-3.51%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

2.29%

+1.67%

Volatility

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF (ZNQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD) (ZSP-U.TO) at 2.96%. This indicates that ZNQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZSP-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZNQ.TOZSP-U.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.96%

+1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

8.99%

+3.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

11.64%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.81%

14.95%

+5.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

16.04%

+6.30%

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZNQ.TO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ZSP-U.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZNQ.TO vs. ZSP-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZNQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while ZSP-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZNQ.TO
BMO NASDAQ 100 Equity Index ETF
0.20%0.25%0.30%0.35%0.23%0.12%0.47%0.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZSP-U.TO
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (USD)
0.00%0.14%0.71%0.98%1.13%0.91%1.02%1.07%1.26%1.22%1.43%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZNQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZSP-U.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZSP-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ZNQ.TO.

ZNQ.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ZSP-U.TO is S&P 500. ZNQ.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while ZSP-U.TO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZNQ.TO and 0.09% for ZSP-U.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZNQ.TO and ZSP-U.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer