ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO
ZMU.TO (BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and FCSB.NEO (Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, ZMU.TO returned -0.16%/yr vs 3.05%/yr for FCSB.NEO. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZMU.TO achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than FCSB.NEO's 1.77% return.
ZMU.TO
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 2.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.75%
FCSB.NEO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.49%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 6.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZMU.TO BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -0.41% | 7.47% | 1.42% | 7.89% | -14.71% | -1.75% | 8.27% | 1.72% |
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 1.77% | 4.15% | 7.55% | 6.81% | -4.22% | -0.81% | 6.26% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZMU.TO and FCSB.NEO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
ZMU.TO
FCSB.NEO
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO) and Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZMU.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.26 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 2.45 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.76 | 9.00 | -7.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZMU.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than FCSB.NEO's maximum drawdown of -12.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMU.TO and FCSB.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZMU.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.30% | -12.48% | -8.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.11% | -1.58% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.05% | -1.58% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -7.44% | -13.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -0.23% | -2.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -1.49% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.30% | 0.43% | +0.87% |
Volatility
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (FCSB.NEO) at 0.96%. This indicates that ZMU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSB.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZMU.TO | FCSB.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.63% | 0.96% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 2.18% | +1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.70% | 2.78% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.90% | 3.32% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 4.94% | +2.94% |
Dividends
ZMU.TO vs. FCSB.NEO - Dividend Comparison
ZMU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FCSB.NEO's 3.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSB.NEO Fidelity Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond ETF | 3.80% | 3.73% | 3.59% | 3.06% | 2.09% | 1.58% | 2.34% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZMU.TO BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 4.48% | 4.10% | 4.15% | 4.22% | 4.35% | 3.56% | 3.51% | 3.66% | 3.70% | 3.28% | 3.37% | 3.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZMU.TO and FCSB.NEO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: BMO and Fidelity.
Find the right allocation for ZMU.TO and FCSB.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer