PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZMU.TO (BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and CBH.TO (iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, ZMU.TO returned 1.75%/yr vs 2.35%/yr for CBH.TO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMU.TO achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than CBH.TO's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, ZMU.TO has underperformed CBH.TO with an annualized return of 1.75%, while CBH.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 2.35% annualized return.

ZMU.TO

1D
-0.48%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-0.72%
1Y
2.28%
3Y*
4.49%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
1.75%

CBH.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.58%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
2.25%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZMU.TO
BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF		-0.41%7.47%1.42%7.89%-14.71%-1.75%8.27%12.98%-2.77%4.58%
CBH.TO
iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF		1.64%4.60%6.19%6.48%-6.85%-2.08%7.99%5.62%0.92%0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMU.TO and CBH.TO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

0.45

The correlation between ZMU.TO and CBH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF

iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF

Often compared with CBH.TO:
CBH.TO vs. CBO.TOCBH.TO vs. ZBBB.TOCBH.TO vs. DCBC.TOCBH.TO vs. FCSB.NEOCBH.TO vs. XIGS.TOCBH.TO vs. XIG.TOCBH.TO vs. ZCM.TO

Return for Risk

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZMU.TO
ZMU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ZMU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
CBH.TO
CBH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CBH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO) and iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZMU.TOCBH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.49
1.27

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.71
1.83

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.85

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.76

5.54

-3.78

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the CBH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMU.TO and CBH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMU.TO drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, which is greater than CBH.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMU.TO and CBH.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZMU.TOCBH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-16.36%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.14%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-2.14%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.30%

-10.50%

-10.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.30%

-16.36%

-4.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.05%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-1.86%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

0.71%

+0.59%

Volatility

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ZMU.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) at 0.90%. This indicates that ZMU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZMU.TOCBH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.63%

0.90%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.40%

2.30%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.70%

3.12%

+1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.90%

4.04%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

6.47%

+1.41%

Dividends

ZMU.TO vs. CBH.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than CBH.TO's 3.37% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBH.TO
iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF		3.37%3.32%3.21%3.28%3.17%2.91%2.92%3.33%3.65%3.82%2.59%2.94%
ZMU.TO
BMO Mid-Term US IG Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF		4.48%4.10%4.15%4.22%4.35%3.56%3.51%3.66%3.70%3.28%3.37%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZMU.TO and CBH.TO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: BMO and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMU.TO and CBH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer