PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jul 1, 2026
See Documentation

ZMP.TO (BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZMP.TO is a Government Bonds fund managed by BMO, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Over the past 10 years, ZMP.TO returned 1.80%/yr vs 17.32%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZMP.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMP.TO achieves a 2.28% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 32.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ZMP.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 1.80%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.32% annualized return.

ZMP.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
0.63%
YTD
2.28%
6M
2.21%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.19%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
1.80%

ZEB.TO

1D
0.73%
1M
11.13%
YTD
32.05%
6M
31.46%
1Y
71.16%
3Y*
36.64%
5Y*
20.81%
10Y*
17.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZMP.TO
BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF		2.28%4.45%4.77%5.88%-9.87%-2.98%9.57%5.72%1.45%1.09%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		32.05%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ZMP.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2013

-0.08

The correlation between ZMP.TO and ZEB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Often compared with ZEB.TO:
ZEB.TO vs. ZWB.TOZEB.TO vs. VDY.TOZEB.TO vs. HBNK.TOZEB.TO vs. HCAL.TOZEB.TO vs. HMAX.TOZEB.TO vs. ZSP.TOZEB.TO vs. XIC.TO

Return for Risk

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZMP.TO
ZMP.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
ZMP.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMP.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMP.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMP.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMP.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZMP.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ZMP.TOZEB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.93
5.56

-4.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.29
7.42

-6.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

2.01

-0.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

8.48

-7.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

36.45

-32.98

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMP.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMP.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMP.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMP.TO and ZEB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZMP.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-39.69%

+23.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-8.44%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.23%

-14.80%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.49%

-25.97%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.53%

-39.69%

+23.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

0.00%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-5.63%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.96%

-0.75%

Volatility

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF (ZMP.TO) is 1.14%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that ZMP.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZMP.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

3.10%

-1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

11.14%

-7.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.45%

12.88%

-8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.60%

13.55%

-6.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.62%

16.87%

-11.25%

Dividends

ZMP.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZMP.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, more than ZEB.TO's 2.30% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		2.30%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%
ZMP.TO
BMO Mid Provincial Bond Index ETF		3.16%2.93%2.92%2.97%3.05%2.67%2.52%2.69%2.71%2.93%2.93%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZMP.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZMP.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMP.TO and ZEB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer