PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMI.TO vs. LDUR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO Monthly Income ETF (ZMI.TO) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
2.98%7.88%13.43%9.00%-5.89%11.25%2.40%13.37%-2.52%4.84%
LDUR
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF
1.87%0.91%14.17%2.47%2.60%-1.45%2.73%-0.86%9.62%-4.44%
Different Trading Currencies

ZMI.TO is traded in CAD, while LDUR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LDUR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMI.TO achieves a 2.98% return, which is significantly higher than LDUR's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, ZMI.TO has outperformed LDUR with an annualized return of 6.17%, while LDUR has yielded a comparatively lower 3.20% annualized return.


ZMI.TO

1D
1.29%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
2.98%
6M
2.10%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.90%
10Y*
6.17%

LDUR

1D
0.07%
1M
1.61%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.74%
1Y
0.92%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
3.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMI.TO has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LDUR's 0.54% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZMI.TO
ZMI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ZMI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZMI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZMI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ZMI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZMI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

LDUR
LDUR Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LDUR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDUR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDUR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
LDUR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDUR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Monthly Income ETF (ZMI.TO) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZMI.TOLDURDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.17

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

0.26

+1.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.03

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

0.27

+0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.53

0.53

+4.00

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZMI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the LDUR Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZMI.TO and LDUR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZMI.TOLDURDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.17

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.67

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.45

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.58

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between ZMI.TO and LDUR is -0.10. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Dividend Comparison

ZMI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than LDUR's 4.47% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZMI.TO
BMO Monthly Income ETF
4.30%4.54%4.68%4.94%4.49%3.71%4.21%4.24%4.58%4.06%3.89%3.89%
LDUR
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF
4.47%4.60%4.77%4.11%2.22%0.90%2.15%3.14%2.66%2.08%1.85%2.92%

Drawdowns

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMI.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, which is greater than LDUR's maximum drawdown of -12.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMI.TO and LDUR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMI.TOLDURDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.65%

-8.68%

-17.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.66%

-1.17%

-6.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.65%

-6.75%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.65%

-8.68%

-17.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.36%

-1.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.14%

-0.86%

-1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.24%

+1.79%

Volatility

ZMI.TO vs. LDUR - Volatility Comparison

BMO Monthly Income ETF (ZMI.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) at 1.48%. This indicates that ZMI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZMI.TOLDURDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

1.48%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

3.62%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

5.46%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.39%

6.47%

+0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.83%

7.17%

+1.66%